Matchup Overview
The New Orleans Pelicans and Utah Jazz faced off in a thrilling match that kept fans on the edge of their seats. Both teams showcased impressive performances, but in the end, the Pelicans emerged victorious with a final score of 118-108. Let's dive into the player statistics to gain insights into the key factors that contributed to this outcome.
Shooting
The Pelicans were more efficient from the field, shooting 52.8% compared to the Jazz's 44.2%. This advantage was particularly evident in the three-point shooting, where the Pelicans hit 15 out of 40 attempts (37.5%) while the Jazz made only 6 out of 25 (24.0%).
Key Players
Brandon Ingram (Pelicans): Ingram led the scoring for the Pelicans with 26 points on 10-of-17 shooting. He also contributed 6 rebounds and 5 assists.
Zion Williamson (Pelicans): Williamson had a strong performance, scoring 25 points on 10-of-15 shooting. He was a force in the paint, pulling down 10 rebounds and dishing out 6 assists.
CJ McCollum (Pelicans): McCollum added 22 points, 5 rebounds, and 6 assists to the Pelicans' cause. His shooting was efficient, as he made 8 of his 14 attempts.
Lauri Markkanen (Jazz): Markkanen was the leading scorer for the Jazz, putting up 27 points on 10-of-18 shooting. He also grabbed 10 rebounds.
Jordan Clarkson (Jazz): Clarkson contributed 18 points off the bench for the Jazz. He shot 7-of-11 from the field and hit 3 three-pointers.
Rebounding
The Pelicans outrebounded the Jazz 54-38, with Zion Williamson's 10 rebounds playing a significant role. This advantage in rebounding allowed the Pelicans to control the tempo of the game and create second-chance opportunities.
Assists
The Pelicans also had an edge in assists, finishing with 30 compared to the Jazz's 19. This teamwork and ability to move the ball effectively contributed to the Pelicans' offensive success.
Turnovers
The Jazz committed more turnovers (15) than the Pelicans (11). These turnovers often led to Pelicans fast breaks and easy scoring opportunities.
Three-Point Shooting
As mentioned earlier, the Pelicans dominated in three-point shooting, making 15 out of 40 attempts (37.5%) compared to the Jazz's 6 out of 25 (24.0%). This discrepancy gave the Pelicans a significant advantage in scoring and allowed them to spread the floor.
Free Throw Shooting
The Pelicans shot more free throws than the Jazz (22-16), but the Jazz were more efficient, making 15 of their 16 attempts (93.8%). The Pelicans, on the other hand, made only 18 of their 22 attempts (81.8%).
Defense
Both teams played solid defense, but the Pelicans were able to force more turnovers and contest more shots. The Pelicans also had more blocks (6-2) and steals (7-5).
Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
---|---|---|---|
Brandon Ingram | 26 | 6 | 5 |
Zion Williamson | 25 | 10 | 6 |
CJ McCollum | 22 | 5 | 6 |
Lauri Markkanen | 27 | 10 | 3 |
Jordan Clarkson | 18 | 4 | 3 |
Category | Pelicans | Jazz |
---|---|---|
Field Goal Percentage | 52.8% | 44.2% |
Three-Point Percentage | 37.5% | 24.0% |
Free Throw Percentage | 81.8% | 93.8% |
Category | Pelicans | Jazz |
---|---|---|
Total Rebounds | 54 | 38 |
Offensive Rebounds | 16 | 10 |
Defensive Rebounds | 38 | 28 |
Importance of Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis plays a crucial role in basketball by providing data-driven insights that can help teams identify areas for improvement and optimize their performance. By tracking and analyzing statistics, coaches and players can make informed decisions about strategy, tactics, and individual player development.
Benefits of Statistical Analysis
Embrace the power of statistical analysis to enhance your basketball knowledge and improve your team's performance. Track and analyze player statistics, identify trends, and make data-driven decisions to maximize success on the court.
2024-10-04 12:15:38 UTC
2024-10-10 00:52:34 UTC
2024-10-04 18:58:35 UTC
2024-09-28 05:42:26 UTC
2024-10-03 15:09:29 UTC
2024-09-23 08:07:24 UTC
2024-10-09 00:33:30 UTC
2024-09-27 14:37:41 UTC
2024-09-20 08:28:20 UTC
2024-09-20 11:01:08 UTC
2024-09-23 04:35:23 UTC
2024-09-28 16:43:55 UTC
2024-10-01 14:43:53 UTC
2024-10-08 02:28:39 UTC
2024-10-10 09:50:19 UTC
2024-10-10 09:49:41 UTC
2024-10-10 09:49:32 UTC
2024-10-10 09:49:16 UTC
2024-10-10 09:48:17 UTC
2024-10-10 09:48:04 UTC
2024-10-10 09:47:39 UTC